Comparative efficacy and safety of chemical peels for acne vulgaris: a systematic review and network metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials
Authors:
Abeer Abdulkarium Aloraini
, Dimah Ahmed Aljameel
, Renad hamoud alosaimi
, Riham Abdullah Almuqati
, Roaa Mohammed Alzahrani
, Saud Abdulrahman Alshegaihi
, Sultan Amjad Al zamil
, Abdullah M. Albazie
, Renad Ibrahim Alsulaiman
, Lama Saeed Alshehri
, Lina Abed
, Albaraa Ayoub
, Ahad Alruhaimi
, Nouf Alzahrani
Abstract
Background: Chemical peels are widely used for mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris, but comparative evidence is dispersed across small trials and multiple active formulations. This review synthesized the supplied randomized evidence and compared efficacy and tolerability across peel types using network meta-analysis.
Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for randomized active-comparator trials of chemical peels for acne vulgaris up to June 2026. Random-effects network meta-analyses used standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for categorical and safety outcomes, each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Salicylic acid was the reference treatment, and treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.
Results: Twenty-three randomized trials with reported enrollment totaling 1,170 participants were included. Most continuous efficacy comparisons were not statistically significant. Relative to salicylic acid, Jessner's solution was associated with a smaller reduction in papule count (SMD 2.49, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.70) and a smaller reduction in Michaelsson acne score (SMD 1.78, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.16). Salicylic plus mandelic acid ranked highest for good improvement (SUCRA 91.9%), but its RR versus salicylic acid was imprecise (RR 1.96, 95% CI 0.75 to 5.13). Trichloroacetic acid was associated with more erythema than salicylic acid (RR 2.74, 95% CI 1.10 to 6.78). Heterogeneity was substantial for non-inflammatory lesion count, papule count, pustule count, and Michaelsson acne score. Treatment-label fragmentation and undocumented handling of split-face correlations limited confidence in rankings.
Conclusion: Our analysis does not establish broad superiority of one chemical peel for acne vulgaris. Salicylic acid performed favorably against Jessner's solution for selected efficacy outcomes and had a lower erythema risk than trichloroacetic acid, but most estimates were imprecise and several networks were heterogeneous. Treatment choice should remain individualized, and the findings require confirmation in rigorously reported head-to-head trials with standardized outcomes.
Keywords: Acne vulgaris, chemical peel, salicylic acid, glycolic acid, trichloroacetic acid, network meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial.
Pubmed Style
Abeer Abdulkarium Aloraini, Dimah Ahmed Aljameel , Renad hamoud alosaimi , Riham Abdullah Almuqati , Roaa Mohammed Alzahrani , Saud Abdulrahman Alshegaihi , Sultan Amjad Al zamil, Abdullah M. Albazie , Renad Ibrahim Alsulaiman , Lama Saeed Alshehri , Lina Abed , Albaraa Ayoub , Ahad Alruhaimi , Nouf Alzahrani. Comparative efficacy and safety of chemical peels for acne vulgaris: a systematic review and network metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. AMEM. 2026; 30 (October 2026): -. doi:10.24911/amem.15-3188
Publication History
Received: September 24, 2026
Accepted: October 18, 2026
Published: October 30, 2026
Authors
Abeer Abdulkarium Aloraini
College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dimah Ahmed Aljameel
College of Medicine and Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Renad hamoud alosaimi
College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Riham Abdullah Almuqati
College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Roaa Mohammed Alzahrani
College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Saud Abdulrahman Alshegaihi
College of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan Amjad Al zamil
College of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah M. Albazie
College of Medicine and Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Renad Ibrahim Alsulaiman
College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lama Saeed Alshehri
College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Lina Abed
College of Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Albaraa Ayoub
College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia.
Ahad Alruhaimi
College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia.
Nouf Alzahrani
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,