Review Article

Published: Oct 30, 2026 | DOI: 10.24911/amem.15-3188

Comparative efficacy and safety of chemical peels for acne vulgaris: a systematic review and network metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials


Authors: Abeer Abdulkarium Aloraini , Dimah Ahmed Aljameel , Renad hamoud alosaimi , Riham Abdullah Almuqati , Roaa Mohammed Alzahrani , Saud Abdulrahman Alshegaihi , Sultan Amjad Al zamil , Abdullah M. Albazie , Renad Ibrahim Alsulaiman , Lama Saeed Alshehri , Lina Abed , Albaraa Ayoub , Ahad Alruhaimi , Nouf Alzahrani ORCID logo


Abstract

Background: Chemical peels are widely used for mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris, but comparative evidence is dispersed across small trials and multiple active formulations. This review synthesized the supplied randomized evidence and compared efficacy and tolerability across peel types using network meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for randomized active-comparator trials of chemical peels for acne vulgaris up to June 2026. Random-effects network meta-analyses used standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for categorical and safety outcomes, each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Salicylic acid was the reference treatment, and treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.

Results: Twenty-three randomized trials with reported enrollment totaling 1,170 participants were included. Most continuous efficacy comparisons were not statistically significant. Relative to salicylic acid, Jessner's solution was associated with a smaller reduction in papule count (SMD 2.49, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.70) and a smaller reduction in Michaelsson acne score (SMD 1.78, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.16). Salicylic plus mandelic acid ranked highest for good improvement (SUCRA 91.9%), but its RR versus salicylic acid was imprecise (RR 1.96, 95% CI 0.75 to 5.13). Trichloroacetic acid was associated with more erythema than salicylic acid (RR 2.74, 95% CI 1.10 to 6.78). Heterogeneity was substantial for non-inflammatory lesion count, papule count, pustule count, and Michaelsson acne score. Treatment-label fragmentation and undocumented handling of split-face correlations limited confidence in rankings.

Conclusion: Our analysis does not establish broad superiority of one chemical peel for acne vulgaris. Salicylic acid performed favorably against Jessner's solution for selected efficacy outcomes and had a lower erythema risk than trichloroacetic acid, but most estimates were imprecise and several networks were heterogeneous. Treatment choice should remain individualized, and the findings require confirmation in rigorously reported head-to-head trials with standardized outcomes.


Keywords: Acne vulgaris, chemical peel, salicylic acid, glycolic acid, trichloroacetic acid, network meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial.



Pubmed Style

Abeer Abdulkarium Aloraini, Dimah Ahmed Aljameel , Renad hamoud alosaimi , Riham Abdullah Almuqati , Roaa Mohammed Alzahrani , Saud Abdulrahman Alshegaihi , Sultan Amjad Al zamil, Abdullah M. Albazie , Renad Ibrahim Alsulaiman , Lama Saeed Alshehri , Lina Abed , Albaraa Ayoub , Ahad Alruhaimi , Nouf Alzahrani. Comparative efficacy and safety of chemical peels for acne vulgaris: a systematic review and network metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. AMEM. 2026; 30 (October 2026): -. doi:10.24911/amem.15-3188

Publication History

Received: September 24, 2026

Accepted: October 18, 2026

Published: October 30, 2026


Authors

Abeer Abdulkarium Aloraini

College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Dimah Ahmed Aljameel

College of Medicine and Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Renad hamoud alosaimi

College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Riham Abdullah Almuqati

College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Roaa Mohammed Alzahrani

College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Saud Abdulrahman Alshegaihi

College of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Sultan Amjad Al zamil

College of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Abdullah M. Albazie

College of Medicine and Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Renad Ibrahim Alsulaiman

College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Lama Saeed Alshehri

College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Lina Abed

College of Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Albaraa Ayoub

College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia.

Ahad Alruhaimi

College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia.

Nouf Alzahrani

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,

ORCID logo ORCID