Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Microdebrider-Assisted Turbinoplasty in Chronic Nasal Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Authors:
Wojood Mohammed Al-Talhi
, Taif Abdulrazaq Alghamdi
, Shaden Othman Bamusa
, Ali Saad Almuntashiri
, Jana Ahmad Alshehri
, Shahad Matuq Althomali
, Ammar Abdullah Alsabilah
, Almas Ahmed Alarjan
, Saud Ayed Alharthi
Abstract
Chronic nasal obstruction that caused by inferior turbinate hypertrophy is common thus surgical intervention is needed when medical treatments fail. Microdebrider-assisted turbinoplasty (MAT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) represent two minimally invasive approaches, yet their comparative long-term efficacy and safety remain subject of debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of MAT and RFA in improving both objective and subjective measures of nasal obstruction, as well as to evaluate their respective safety profiles. Thesearch was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the last ten years. The studies included were those that compared MAT and RFA in adults with turbinate hypertrophy. The analysis of the included RCTs showed that both MAT and RFA provided significant and comparable short-term improvements (3-12 months) in objective nasal airflow and subjective nasal obstruction. However, long-term data (up to 3 years) indicated that MAT resulted in superior outcomes, including greater improvement in nasal patency and a significantly lower rate of disease recurrence. The safety profiles of the two techniques also varied; RFA was associated with prolonged postoperative crusting, while MAT had a higher incidence of intraoperative bleeding. In conclusion, both MAT and RFA are effective treatments for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. For patients seeking a more durable long-term solution, MAT is recommended due to its superior efficacy and lower recurrence rates. Ultimately, clinical decision should be customized based on patient preference and a through discussion of specific risk profiles.
Keywords: Chronic Nasal Obstruction, Inferior Turbinate, Microdebrider-Assisted Turbinoplasty, Nasal Turbinate, Radiofrequency Ablation
Pubmed Style
Wojood Mohammed Al-Talhi, Taif Abdulrazaq Alghamdi, Shaden Othman Bamusa, Ali Saad Almuntashiri, Jana Ahmad Alshehri, Shahad Matuq Althomali, Ammar Abdullah Alsabilah, Almas Ahmed Alarjan, Saud Ayed Alharthi . Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Microdebrider-Assisted Turbinoplasty in Chronic Nasal Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. AMEM. 2026; 17 (April 2026): -. doi:10.24911/amem.15-2702
Publication History
Received: March 02, 2026
Revised: March 08, 2026 Revised: March 18, 2026 Revised: March 29, 2026
Accepted: April 02, 2026
Published: April 17, 2026
Authors
Taif Abdulrazaq Alghamdi
College of medicine, Taif university, Taif, Saudi Arabia
Shaden Othman Bamusa
College of medicine, Taif university, Taif, Saudi Arabia
Ali Saad Almuntashiri
College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura university, Alqunfudhah, Saudi Arabia
Jana Ahmad Alshehri
College of medicine, Taif university, Taif, Saudi Arabia
Shahad Matuq Althomali
College of medicine, Taif university, Taif, Saudi Arabia
Ammar Abdullah Alsabilah
College of Medicine, Jouf University, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia
Almas Ahmed Alarjan
College of Medicine, Jouf University, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia
Saud Ayed Alharthi
King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Rhinology and skull base surgery consultant, Taif, Saudia Arabia